Ethnic influences appear everywhere today, in our clothes, in our food, in the people we meet on the street, and in the instructions on products we buy. In my work, I struggle to make sense of the immigrant experience, the memories of my own exposure to other cultures, stories from my family’s pioneer past, and the migrant history we share as we work to integrate our society.

I use the form of the headdress and the technique of weaving to describe what we mean to each other and how those meanings come into being. As I weave, I look for signs of what the future holds and I am hopeful and discouraged, fearless and worried, invigorated and weary, but always curious.

Monday, January 2, 2017

Coming Soon. . . . . .

Hello Dear Readers,
I am in the process of combinging my glass work, my weaving work, and both of my blogs into one web site.   As of the middle of March, 2017 you will be able to see all of my work at my new web site:

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Introducing. . .

I originally started this blog when I was studying for my MFA.  Actually, it was a requirement!  I'm going to continue to post my 3D weaving experiments here, but I've just started a new blog that is dedicated to the clothing items that I make.  My new blog is called

I hope to see you there!

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

This project is my latest 3D weaving effort.  It was by far the most difficult drafting I've ever done - I didn'tget it right until the 9th version.

The ruffle was woven first, using 3 different huck lace patterns.  I put pattern 1 on the far right using 8 shafts and made it one pattern "unit" wide.   The next section used 2 shafts and was just tabby.   To the left of the tabby, I put the second huck pattern on top with a third huck pattern underneath.  The second huck pattern was two pattern "units" wide and the 3d huck pattern, under the 2nd, was 3 pattern "units" wide.   Pattern 2 used 6 shafts, and pattern 3 used 8, for a total of 24.  Patterns 2 and 3 were woven as two layer double weave.

So, I opened the shed and wove all with all of the even numbered tabby threads up for about 50 picks, changed the tabby shed, packed it in to create the ruffle, and wove another 50 picks with the odd numbered tabby threads up, etc., etc.   In this way I wove the ruffle with one pattern on the right, the gathered section (the tabby) and then the two layers on the left.   Because of all this, the tabby threads and the part where patterns 2 and 3 were on top of each other, had a sett of 48, while the rest of the weaving had a sett of 24.
Of course all this caused some tension problems, to say nothing of the tension problems caused by the gathering that made the ruffles.   But I persisted and got the ruffle made.   At that point, I re-threaded and re-sleyed the center part, where the sett was 48, to spread the patterns out.   Finally, I wove the body of the vest - the flat cloth from which the vest was made.  When I sewed the vest, I didn't have enough flat cloth for the back, so used a commercial fabric for that.   I think this actually turned out to be a good thing, because it would have been too "busy" otherwise.   I also lined the vest with a silk fabric.

For the button, I found something that looks woven itself, so I think it works well on this piece.  Because the ruffle is a bit difficult to iron, I decided to attach it with a series of snaps rather than sewing it on.   That way I can wash the vest and the ruffle separately and iron them separately.  By looking at the picture of the flat cloth, you can see the 3 designs that were used in the ruffle.

The fiber used was 16/2 linen, for both the warp and weft.   This was woven on a Louet Magic dobby with 24 shafts.

I entered this piece which I call "3D Loom Woven Ruffled Vest" into the Northern Colorado Weavers Guild exhibit Fiber Celebration 2014 - and it won 3 awards!   It won the Complex Weavers Award for Excellence in Complex Weaving. First Place in Wearables, and the Jouror's Choice Roving Tizi Award.

This piece was also entered into the WEBS 40th Anniversary Weaving Contest, and I was notified that is was one of the finalists.   Unfortunately, they don't insure the pieces in the contest for much, and so I had to look for my own insurance.   I was able to find it, but the cost was $358!   Yikes!   So, I was forced to withdraw from the contest.   Even if it won first place, I would have only broken even - maybe.

My dream is that, someday, people who run exhibits will show a little respect for the work and creativity that goes into the artist's work, and will see fit to actually try to make sure that artists don't have to take all the risk to show their work.   Did I mention, I'm "once bitten, twice shy" in this regard?    If you look at the pictures to the left, you will see a piece titled "Alien."   This piece "went walking" during an exhibit, never to be seen again.   I no longer exhibit without insurance.  (The Northern Colorado Weavers Guild was terrific in this regard.   You tell them the value, and they insure the work.   Wow!  That's they way it should be!)

Friday, May 30, 2014

3D loom weaving

I've got a new loom that is my go-to loom for 3D weaving.   It's a Louet Magic Dobby with and electronic interface and 24 shafts.    I added something I call a "rod beam" that serves the purpose of multiple warp beams, and a "cloth trap" that manages the tension on the woven cloth.   With these two additions and all those shafts, my 3D loom weaving has expanded greatly!  YA!

The first item I made was an apron.   Now, mind you, this involved trying several new things in one piece.   The rod beam was new, the cloth trap was new, and the loom was new to me.    In spite of this, I think it turned out pretty good, although there are one or two treddling errors as I got used to an electronic interface.

The apron ties were made with a long piece of warp, and the apron itself was a shorter piece.   I wove one of the ties, then added the skirt of the apron, and finished up weaving the second tie.  The edges of the apron skirt were a double weave so that I could turn the layers in and hem the sides.

The gathers on the skirt were woven in, not gathered later as is usually done.  

Thursday, May 20, 2010

My new tapestry loom!

I just finished building this sweet little tapestry loom from mahogany wood given to me by a friend. (Thanks Steve!)   I wanted a little loom that I could fold up and take with me on weekend trips, even while warped.  I also wanted a tapestry loom with real harnesses and a real reed.   The weaving width is 24 inches and the over all dimensions are 41 inches high, 34 inches wide including handles and 33 inches deep.  The reed, string heddles, ratchets and  handles were all purchased from Camilla Valley Farms.   The reed is held up with springs, which I released to show the reed on one of these pictures.

The shed under the reed is about 2 inches

Tuesday, January 26, 2010


We have always had a love / hate relationship with immigration, ever since the days of the Puritans.   As children, we were told that the Puritans came to America for religious freedom, but the truth is a really more complicated than that. 
The Reformation was underway throughout Europe, and with it came new ideas about the roles of the church and the roles of the state in the lives of citizens.  The Puritans were at odds with the English monarchy over religious views and hoped to create a place where everyone believed as they did.  The “puritans” wanted a pure religion, one base on the strictest interpretation of the Bible, and they wanted to purge the church of any influence from Rome.  Puritans did not believe in religious liberty or personal freedom of conscience.  They believed only in the religious freedom of others to agree with them and, in fact, they believed that God’s will required religious intolerance
In 1625 Charles I, became the king of England.  Charles I was an authoritarian ruler who married a Catholic and proceeded to crack down on the Puritans.  To the Puritans of the day, it seemed that a refuge was needed and in 1627 they began planning the Massachusetts Bay Colony as that refuge.  But even so, they were not entirely free to seek this refuge.  The monarchy applied a sort of loyalty test when deciding who would be allowed to immigrate.
Religious intolerance in the New World resulted in a trials for those who dared to express differing opinions.  Ann Hutchinson was one person who, because of her outspoken views, caused much controversy in the new colony.  As a result, she was banished from Massachusetts and excommunicated from the church for her views in 1637.  That summer, as ships entered the Boston harbor, the fisherman called out to the new immigrants, “the churches are on fire!”  Many of the issues from those times, such as the separation of church and state, are still alive and well today.
In was into this environment that my ancestor, Matthew Whipple immigrated from England in about 1638 and settled in Ipswich, Massachusetts.
Intolerance is still with us, and  during times of cultural uncertainty, we may unwittingly exaggerate any perceived threats to our way of life.   In the past these threats have resulted in the Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, the Nazis regime, and Mao’s attack on intellectuals, to name just a few.
            In my woven hat Pilgrim, I depict our intolerance, past and present, through color, using black and silver to represent dark and light.  The brim and crown of the hat are separated by a hat band of Bible verse, in black and white.  This hat band  represents the separation of church and state, but also the common basis of the laws of both.  Hung at the hat band is a small lock and a set of keys.  Will we use the lock as the Puritans did, to “lock” onto an intolerant  view of others?   Or, can we find the key to responding to threats and struggles without intolerance?  Do we wish to lock out new immigrants, or make a place for them, as once was done for us?


One of my first memories is of made-in-Japan toys that I received as a child.  These toys were cheaply made and quickly broken. Years later, working in the corporate world where my company competed with much-improved Japanese products, I learned how American management consultants helped rebuild the Japanese economy after World War II.   These consultants brought their management philosophies to Japan just when American companies were forgetting those same lessons.  Eventually we lost much of our high technology manufacturing base to Japan, Taiwan, China, and Korea, and had to relearn the lessons we taught Japan after the war. 
As I worked on this piece, I remembered the resentment my grandparent’s generation felt towards Japan as a result of their  attacks on Pearl Harbor.  I remembered stories about how Japanese-Americans were treated during the war, and about the atomic bombs we dropped on Japan.  I was forced to reconcile these memories with modern Japan, a country that is now a close friend and valued trading partner.
But, my weaving is more than a reference to America’s long and complex history with Japan.  It is also a reference to my family’s complex history with Japan.   I had been told stories of my uncle, who died in a Japanese Prisoner of War camp.  Then one evening, while watching the History Channel,  I saw a story about US soldiers stationed in the Philippines.  These American soldiers were attacked just a few hours after the attack on Pearl Harbor, and were eventually taken prisoner by the Japanese.  After several months of starvation rations, 75,000 US and Filipino solders were forced on a 60 mile march without food or water.  This march became known as the Bataan Death March.
 The surprising thing was, the soldiers who survived the Bataan Death March arrived in the place where I was told that my Uncle had died.  Could my Uncle have been one of the 335 men of the 7th Material Squadron, 19th Bomb Group?  After searching the internet, I found a web site that contained the history of these men.   One of the documents pictured there was a notebook keep by a Sgt. Stuckey.   There, on one of the last pages, was the name of my Uncle, Lloyd Whipple, with a note that he had died in July of 1942.   According to Army Air Force records, he died of malaria.  He had been a strong farm boy, which probably allowed him survive the Bataan Death March, only to die later of malaria.  He had been in the service for less than a year, arriving in the Philippines a little over a month before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
We never got my Uncle’s body back.   His surviving fellow soldiers were not liberated until close to the end of the war, several years later. 
My family lost one family member during World War II, but some time later we gained another family member as a Japanese war bride. 
Like many people, my family has been forced to revise our views of Japan and its people.  In my work, I illustrate the complexity of these experiences by combining the traditional Geisha hairstyle form with memory boards to juxtapose the old Japan with the new; the traditional Japan with the modern manufacturing dominance of the Far Easter countries.  Memory boards and computer chips exist all over my house, in everything from my coffee maker, to my bathroom scale, to the Japanese cars in my driveway.  Almost all of the products we now buy were manufactured in a Far East that didn’t exist when I was a child. 
I wonder, what would my Uncle think of this turn of events?


One day while shopping a few blocks from my home, I came across a Muslem family, a couple with a small boy.  The woman was dressed in a head-to-toe black chador and a burkha that covered even her eyes.  It was summer, and I was dressed in blue jeans and a T-shirt.  I smiled at the little boy and was rewarded with a menacing look from his Father.  He was obviously threatened by my dress and the forwardness of my smile.  Life in the United States must be difficult for this Muslem immigrant because he is constantly faced with fashions and symbols he considers improper.  For this man, did my fashion illustrate what is wrong with the present, predict changes for his future, or both?
The West has a long history of misunderstanding Middle Eastern fashion.  We see the belly dancer as a seductress, but she is an artist who has studied her craft to perfect the motion and symbolism of each move, much as a ballet dancer would.  The West sees the draped Muslem woman as repressed, but she may be making a political statement or celebrating an Islamic revival using the symbols of her own culture.  Muslem school girls have been expelled for wearing the hijab in France and Sikhs have been prevented from wearing full orthodox clothing in Canadian schools.
After the Shah of Iran was overthrown in the Islamic revolution of 1979, many Iranian women adopted the head-to-toe chador as a symbol of protest against the West.  What we either don’t know, or have forgotten, is that the chador was banned by the Shah’s father from 1935 to  1941 because it did not look modern enough.  This forced fashion, in the interest of Westernization, was resented by many women in Iran, and when given the opportunity, they voted with their clothes!
Some fundamentalists  in the Middle East would like to ban all traditional woman’s dance, and those dancers who want to learn this old art, often must do so in private.  The fashion and cultural struggles within the Muslem world demonstrate the conflicts between liberal and fundamentalist views, between forces that value traditional arts and those that would ban them altogether.
The word Harem refers to the private women’s quarters of a Muslem house.  My references in this piece are intended to be mixed up and contradictory, like the Western view of the Muslem world.    This weaving is shaped like a Middle Eastern dancer’s headpiece with a sheer scarf hanging from the point of the cone, but the face is covered by a knit wire mesh, itself covered with United States pennies except for the location of the eyes.   In a Middle Eastern dancer’s costume, coins are usually strung around the hips, where they make a pleasant sound when the woman moves.  In Harem, the coins cover the face like the burkha often worn by Muslem women, referencing both the exposure and concealment of the female body.  The dancer reveals her body and draws attention to it, the burkha conceals. Our society, represented by the pennies, misunderstands.  The pennies also signify unstoppable Western influences such as the internet, and along with it, Western ideas of women’s dress.  These influences cannot help but effect cultures everywhere, including those in the Middle East. 
The Western financial interests in Middle Eastern oil riches would seem to require us to understand this area of the world, but yet we are confused. 

Coolie / Yellow Peril

My piece Coolie / Yellow Peril represents a personal memory as well as American history.  For one year, my last year of high school, my family moved to California.  My boyfriend that year was a fellow student and young Chinese man.  That year was also the 100th anniversary of the completion of the trans-continental railroad, and California was getting ready to celebrate.  To my surprise, at any mention of the event, my boyfriend became furious.  He explained to me the history of the Chinese immigrants, treated like slave-labor by the railroad companies who connected America’s coasts together.  These men, who were so critical to the building of the railroad, were not even allowed at the ceremony in Utah that marked the joining of the East and West coasts.
In the 19th century, when the country was expanding west, Chinese immigrants, mostly young men, came in great numbers to help as farm workers.  In 1882, the United States passed the Chinese Exclusion Act which was in place until 1943.  This law prohibited Chinese immigrants, however, the timber, mining, and railroad industries - and others - needed these workers.  So smugglers brought immigrants from southern China and Hong Kong to British Columbia, where they crossed over into the United States at night.   Does this sound familiar?
My vision of the trans-continental railroad had been simplistic;  to me it represented just a technical advance for transportation and commerce.  But my boyfriend understood the price his immigrant ancestors paid for America’s advancement. 
A small toy railroad track runs around the outer circumference of my woven coolie hat shaped piece, a reminder of both the difficulties faced by early Chinese immigrants, and of my own education on this topic.  The railroad track, in its toy form, also references the way in which Chinese immigrants were depicted as unsophisticated and child-like in the media and cartoons of the day.
This piece reminds the viewer that our own ethnic reference points can limit our view of history, just as they did mine.  Progress for one group may represent hardship for another.  Unless we can consider history from multiple points of view we will not understand the entire story.  But can we ever understand all points of view?  I doubt it.   I hope to remind all of us that  our personal view is limited and that all immigrants play a part in building our country.



            My paternal Grandfather was a German man who immigrated from Russia at about the age of 10 in 1910.   When he arrived, he spoke German and Russian, but no English.  As a child, I was fascinated by this experience, and begged him to tell me stories of the “old country.”   He would not.   From other family members, I learned only that  the family had moved from Germany to Russia at the beginning of the 19th century to start a farming operation. 
            Then recently, I came across some papers of my Father’s and discovered that the family had immigrated from an area that used to be knows as Bessarabia.  Bessarabia is an area that sits on the north-west side of the Black Sea.  After doing some research, I was able to piece the story together.
            Russia and Turkey fought a war from 1806 to 1812.   At the end of the war, the peace treaty know as the Treaty of Bucharest, gave this area to Russia.  But, at the time, the area was populated by Russian peasants, who knew little about farming.  In order to build up the agricultural capability of the area,  Czar Alexander I made lucrative offers to German farmers, enticing them to immigrate in order to start farms.  The first German farmers arrived in 1814. 
            But this area has always been politically troubled.  During the 19th century it became a part of Moldavia,  and, after the War of Romanian Independence, it became Romanian.
            Then in 1903, came the Kishinev Pogrom, which slaughtered Jews in the area.   A second pogrom followed in 1905.  Although Jews were the primary targets, feelings of nationalism were raising in Romania and my Christian ancestors were Auslanders, outsiders, in their own homes.  1905 was also the year of the first Russian Revolution. 
At the same time, tensions were raising in nearby Turkey, and these tensions would eventually  escalate into the Turkish massacre of Armenian Christians in 1915.   No wonder my Grandfather didn’t want to tell me stories of the old country!
So, in about 1910, part of my family moved to the United States and part moved to what would eventually become East Berlin.  How lucky I am to be from the side that immigrated to the United States!  They arrived at Ellis Island, and purchased the longest train ticket that they could afford.   That ticket took them as far as Dodge, North Dakota.  What a shock it must have been, to trade the rich soil and warm climate of the area around the Black Sea for the winters of North Dakota, and soil so poor it was only good for grazing!
This woven piece titled Ausländer, reminds me of what all immigrants must feel at some point, the feeling of being an outsider in a place that should feel like home.   It was inspired, in part, by the headpiece worn by my paternal Grandmother on her wedding day, a day in which she left her home to create another home for herself and her family.  My family had to immigrate several times in order to find home, but throughout, they were farmers, and that fact is referenced by the vegetable fibers braided into the piece.   I use white wool to reference weddings and new beginnings, feathers to represent the search for peace, and gold wire to represent the hope that the new land will provide prosperity.  Aren’t these the dreams of all immigrants?